We have been conceived in a condition that says we have inherited the genetic faults of our forefathers, often referred to as original sin from the fall of mans disobedience in the Garden of Eden. Here the first suckers where Adam and Eve in a sense because they ate from the Tree of Knowledge not the Tree of Life. In actuality the real sucker was Lucifer who thought that he was pulling a fast one on God.

Eph 4:14

That we [henceforth] be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, [and] cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;

My recent trip was to Bethel, Connecticut the home town of PT Barnum, need I say more about  the name of my title. At one time Bethel was part of Danbury which is about 5 miles away. What is amazing about this comparative scenario?  Just like Abraham Lincoln had said to Harriet Beecher Stowe, that she had started this ruckus, the civil war.

Now an Uncivil war is still waging… and why is that?

 (More excitement below)

It is the fact that the biggest challenge in our judicial system is the separation concept belayed onto the America freedom of religion?

When Thomas Jefferson wrote a private letter to the Danbury Baptist he gave his opinion in confidence that the Government could not offend or restrict their freedoms to practice their faith without prejudice from the government.

Now mentioning that was his intent, the real exception to the rule is that it has become the hitching post of legal tender of judicial review and interpretation by legalese type who have inquired into this manmade concept some150 plus years after the letter was written.

How is it that a private letter can be read into judgment, when it was not legislatively reviewed by any significant founders, who where still in amply supply in 1801.

 No not one other expert in that time period was consulted, not any that where involved in either the instrumenting of the Declaration of Independence or that of the most valuable Constitution with its ten bills of rights.

None were consulted about the phrase separation of state and Church, which is not any legal document.

In giving this op-ed piece orchestrated by Jefferson, also a promoter of bibles to Indians, and a big supporter of attending Church in a State building, we have done a grave injustice to the truth, the whole truth.

 No I believe that when the justices only read one phrase out a letter, and not in context of the meaning and intent, that they are guilty of judicial treason and their activism is designed to promote their personal perceptions, and not by the weight and balance of the many legislatives who gave voice to the government of the people, by the people, who are voted by the people, not a solo effort piecemealed by a single sound bite phrase.

The sleight of men is like the cheating of dice players, yes if you watch closely they pick up the dice off the table and make a feign to shake them, but what they roll out on the table is not the same dice that they had picked up. They switched them, and no wonder that one of the favorite expressions on a losing roll is called craps. Supposedly we were betting on more freedom and all we got was a dung heap of confusion.

When they tell you that they don’t talk about politics of religion, you can certainly agree with them, and relate the fact that it may not be their forte, however for yourselves you may state, that I rather not be ignorant on both accounts, because the founder fathers were very astute on these subjects, because ignorance would only lead to darkness.

Hallelujah we can read the truth and live out God’s ordained freedom of truth. Not be subject to the ig noring rants of the falling demigods who know not truth.